|
In the previous section,
I have considered and summarized the internal
evidence that shows that the Book of Mormon fits best in a 19th Century context and was most likely a product of
the brilliant
mind of Joseph Smith. Its dependence on the text of the King James Version of
the Bible, its
employment of King James language, its borrowing from the Apocrypha, its innumerable
grammatical errors, and its many references to 19th century elements and controversies
lead the reader to conclude that the Book of Mormon is simply not a record
of ancient history.
To further support my case, I will next consider the external evidence. It is
not my intent to
provide the reader with an exhaustive review. I will very briefly note some of
the salient findings
from several scientific fields, including archeology, genetics, linguistics,
and geography. I encourage the reader to use the following examples as a springboard
into a more thorough examination of the research.
Consult
my list of recommended readings.
|